In a dramatic series of events affecting Tesla, the electric vehicle giant has recently witnessed a staggering loss in market value, amounting to nearly 500 billion yuan—about 70 billion dollars—within just two trading daysThis decline has raised eyebrows among investors and analysts alike, particularly in light of the recent decision by Morgan Stanley, a prominent investment bank, to downgrade Tesla's target price from 345 dollars to 320 dollarsCompounding the pessimism, the bank warned that in the worst-case scenario, the company’s shares could fall to a mere 100 dollarsJust a month earlier, another significant player in the financial sector, Daiwa Securities, had also cut its target price for Tesla from 245 dollars to 195 dollars.

Prominent Tesla investor Ross Gerber of Gerber Kawasaki Wealth & Investment Management has attributed the company’s stock decline to CEO Elon Musk’s failure to complete critical projectsGerber expressed concerns about the intense competition Tesla faces in international markets, which he believes remains a central challenge for the companyIt’s not merely a matter of market strategy; this situation encapsulates a broader narrative of innovation and operational challenges that Tesla needs to address urgently.

Simultaneously, Tesla’s manufacturing facility in Germany has experienced production halts due to power outages, with no clear indication of when operations might resumeThis incident is projected to result in losses amounting to hundreds of millions of euros for the companyMusk took to social media to criticize the notion of pausing electric vehicle production while still relying on fossil fuel vehicles, labeling such a practice as “extremely foolish.”

Regarding Morgan Stanley's downgrade, analyst Adam Jonas provided an overview of several factors currently burdening TeslaThese include a decline in electric vehicle demand, an aging product lineup compared to contemporaries, fierce competition in the Chinese market, and a shifting consumer preference in the U.S. towards hybrid vehicles instead of fully electric models

Advertisements

In his analysis, he downgraded the target price whilst maintaining a rating of "overweight," which suggests that while he remains cautiously optimistic, there are clear warning signs ahead.

Jonas revised his sales estimates for Tesla for the fiscal year 2024 to below 2 million units, indicating a year-over-year growth rate of just over 10 percentPreviously, he had forecasted a gross margin of 13.2 percent for Tesla’s automotive division, which he has now marked down to 11.4 percentHe emphasized that for Tesla to be recognized as an artificial intelligence company, it must first stabilize its profitability in the automotive sectorHe anticipates that this process could extend over several quarters, during which a conservative estimate of 100 dollars per share may be realistic in a bearish scenario.

The day prior to the Morgan Stanley report, Tesla shares plummeted by 7 percent due to alarming sales data emerging from the Chinese marketFollowing the release of the report, the stock fell an additional 3.93 percent, closing at 180.74 dollars per share, which translated to a market capitalization collapse to 575.6 billion dollarsIn just two days, Tesla's valuation shrank significantly, signaling that investor confidence may be waning.

Earlier this year, Daiwa Securities had substantially downgraded Tesla’s target price, attributing their decision to corporate governance concerns and anticipating a tough financial year for the company in 2024. The trends in the market have compelled analysts to rethink their strategies regarding electric vehicle sales, particularly in light of slowing growth and falling free cash flow—an alarming indicator for a company that has championed itself as a pioneer in green technology.

Among the criticisms levied at Musk is the assertion that his ambitious projects, particularly regarding full self-driving capabilities, remain unrealized, affecting the company’s overall valuationDespite Musk’s threats to withdraw AI projects from Tesla unless he retained 25 percent ownership, Gerber dismissed such notions as fanciful

Advertisements

He stressed that this branding leverages considerable premium for Tesla, and with many projects left incomplete, it suggests the company is returning to a more rational valuation level—something that many financial experts believe is long overdue.

Additionally, the competitive landscape has intensified, notably in the Chinese market, where Tesla has struggled against rivals like BYDLast month, Tesla sold just 60,365 vehicles in China, marking its lowest monthly sales figures since December 2022—a troubling trend for a company that once dominated the marketGerber warned that escalating overseas competition detracts Tesla's focus from other critical projects, emphasizing the urgent need for the company to streamline its operations and enhance its offerings.

In the midst of this tumultuous backdrop, an interesting political narrative unfolded when former U.SPresident Donald Trump was reportedly spotted meeting with Elon Musk and some affluent contributors supportive of the Republican Party in Palm Beach, FloridaThis meeting could signify potential alliances emerging between the tech industry and political figures, as Trump actively seeks to bolster his fundraising efforts by courting influential billionaires like Musk—an individual who has become a symbol of innovation and controversy in contemporary America.

Trump's team has not yet provided comments on these reportsHowever, as speculation mounts regarding future political dynamics in the U.S., the interest of high-profile individuals in the tech sector suggests that significant financial resources could become a focal point of forthcoming electoral campaignsWith current polling indicating a strong performance from Trump against Democratic contenders in the run-up to the elections, this crossroad between technology and politics represents a compelling shift in the socio-economic landscape.

In summary, the confluence of supply chain disruptions, shifting consumer preferences, heightened competition, and external economic pressures has sparked a multifaceted crisis for Tesla

Advertisements

Advertisements

Advertisements